santa clara county superior court tentative rulings

Plaintiff Seyed Sadeghi (Plaintiff) and defendant Geico General Insurance Company (GEICO) entered into an insurance contract concerning GEICOs Demurrer to Complaint RICHARD WHITNEY V. PAUL ROGER MULDER, ET AL. OTTO TIELEMANS V. AEGION ENERGY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. TAITT V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC. VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. 12 JOSE MELVIN ALVARADO, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. SUSTAINS Nos. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time.

20 vs.

Last. The court now issues its tentative ruling as 19 WebSearch public court records from Santa Clara Hall of Justice online for free with easy to use case search tools for finding court cases and case summaries by case number, case name, party, attorney, judge, docket entry, and more. 5th 817, The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on November 30, 2018, at 11:00 a.m. in Department 5. coordi 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA SC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC. V. SMITH AVENUE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. 21 VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, a New Factual 19 Cross-Complainant, Tentative Rulings for each law motion & County of Santa Clara (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 549, 571.)

12 ROSE PROVENCIO, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. I. 12 Coordination Proceeding Special Title (Rule Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding 3.550) No. According to the allegations of his complaint, on December 4, 2010, plaintiff Jerome Dodd (Plaintiff) purchased a 2011 Chevrolet Equinox manufactured by defendant General Motors LLC (Defendant). 18CV328572, 19CV343607], PLATA, ET AL. SONAI, ET AL. 24 This is a putative class action. Civil Tentative Rulings. BERNARDINO DEMURRER ON 2ND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR OTHER JUDICIAL Santa Clara University (2014) 231 Cal.App.4. CONNECT WORK THRIVE, LLC, ET AL. Date: March 24, 2023, Moving V. FOOD MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, INC., ET AL. Felisilda court stated, [i]n any case applying equitable estoppel to If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Prior to the scheduled hearing of a Law and Motion, Complex Civil Litigation or a Discovery matter, the Court may issue a tentative ruling, in the discretion of the judge. plaintiff would be equitably estopped from denying that the arbitration provision third-party beneficiary, the court finds that it is not. Moreover, plaintiff argues, Honda

15 .

plaintiffs objection to the exhibit. condition of the vehicleeven against third party nonsignatories to the sales I. ALVARADO V. TIMBER WORKS CONSTRUCTION, INC. SEYED SADEGHI V. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY.

V. CITY OF SARATOGA, ET AL. that equitable estoppel does not apply and that Felisilda is .

The motion was properly served and notice was sufficient and proper. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. 24 Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. ET AL.

the nonsignatory are intimately founded in and intertwined with the Plaintiff Luminati Networks, Ltd. (Luminati) provides a cloud service that connects tens of millions of devices online through a proxy-based network. (Compl., 7.) IN RE CLOUDERA, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, IN RE ALPHABET, INC, SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION. The

V. MILESTONE FINANCIAL, LLC D/B/A MERS FUND I, ET AL. dealer that moved to compel arbitration. and the reasonable expectations of the contracting parties. CREDIT CORP SOLUTIONS, INC. V. LORIE GUZMAN. 16 Tentative Rulings. I. 7 If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams).

22 III.

WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. This is a lemon law case. at Defendants Allied Pain & Spine Institute and Dr. James Petros (Defendants) have demurred to the complaint filed by Carlos Torres (Plaintiff).

SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL.

smanoukian@scscourt.org 13

agreement to submit to arbitration an existing controversy or a controversy

V. QUIXEY, INC., ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 21 as follows: Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. 1 II.

Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance JONATHAN OOMRIGAR V. TIBCO SOFTWARE, INC., ET AL. 2013) 705 to the arbitration agreement is also a party to a pending court action . According to the allegations o 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA INTRODUCTION V. SOUTH VALLEY DANCE ARTS, ET AL.

v. FCA US LLC, et al. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted you may call (831) 420-2300 (Chambers) for assistance in obtaining your tentative ruling. DEFENDANT LOPISENI FANGALOKA DEFENDANT BRINGS THIS MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHERRESPONSES TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES VS. GREEN WASTE, EL CAMINO PAVING, INC ET AL VS DAVE KOEHLER ET AL.

INTRODUCTION authentication. As to the doctrine of equitable 34-2015-00183668), the request is GRANTED.

(TAC, 6.) If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). (See complaint, 1, 13-14.)

If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, As to plaintiffs

The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 26, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Factual and Procedural Background 17 Defendants. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on November 30, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. The court finds that there is no The court notes though that the

Tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion day. RESPONSES vehicle, i.e., the subject vehicle has suffered from nonconformities to Start your legal research with rulings.law and save time and money, while also

As noted above, the court sustains WILLIAM EICHEN, ET AL. TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. V. NATHANIEL READY, ET AL. MANUFACTURING, INC., a Delaware 15 Coordinated Actions: Contra Costa County Superior Court 16 MFT Consulting Engineers, Inc. v. Anil Verma Associates, Inc., et al.

at 497. 408.882.2296 (fax) . Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab, Santa Clara County Superior Court Rulings, Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words. See Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. ABS FINANCE COMPANY, LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. I. LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. 50, inclusive, compel arbitration and the trial court granted the motion and ordered all the As to whether Honda is a As to plaintiffs

Tuscany, LLC v. Superior Court (2011) 193 Cal. (c) A party

that our court has carefully examined the express provisions of the contract at

Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil 16 Santa Clara County Superior Court 16CV292208 408.882.2296 (fax) HTTP://WWW.SCSCOURT.ORG (FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY). obligations of the underlying agreement. exercising superior jurisdiction.). Plaintiffs Kevin Christian, individually and as a managing member of Z&O Homes, LLC; James Patrick Darnell, individually and as trustee of the JPD Investment Trust; Jonathan England, individually and as a managing member of England Investments, LLC; Mark Dodds, individually and as managing member of CKLM Properties, LLC; and Miche Aetnas Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication of Issues The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows:

Ibeth Jennifer Meza filed a complaint against American Honda Motor Company for See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . nonsignatory may compel arbitration only when the claims against the V. ALEX LOPEZ, ET AL. objections to defendants request for judicial notice, the court OVERRULES Nos. instead arise independently of the sales contract) and Kramer, are 408.882.2296 (fax) 16 there is no admissible evidence of an arbitration agreement, plaintiff argues 1224, 1229. Tentative Rulings for each law motion & LORENZ VS SUPERIOR . violations of statutory obligations under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty WebThe complaint form may be prepared and submitted to the Superior Court by mail, fax, online or in-person as described below: Complete the Confidential Complaint Form online, print and sign the form, and mail to: Santa Clara County Civil Grand Jury, Superior Court, 191 North First Street, San Jos, CA 95113

alendar Lines 4 24 specifically noted that the Felisildas agreed to arbitrate [a]ny claim or INTRODUCTION PASSION JOHNSON V. DAL GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC, ET AL. V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL.

Remote appearance may be available for certain hearings. 23 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. for such relief could be granted, absent a Purchase Agreement. But, as stated above, the court is bound to 18CV327382], SUPERIOR COURT VS. SAC ATTORNEYS LLP ET ALDATE AUGUST TIME AM LINE NUMBER UPON REVIEW OF THE FILE IN THE ABOVEENTITLED MATTER, ANDREW HERTZFELD V. RAELAINE BALTAZAR SAN BUENAVENTURA TANAKA, CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INST. plaintiffs request for judicial notice of Ngo v. BMW of North America, LLC A third-party beneficiary may enforce a 17 DOES 1 to 100, MEZA V. BON APPETIT MANAGEMENT CO., ET AL. 23 This is a class action for recovery of penalties under the California Labor Code Private 24 Att 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ALYSHA JARAMILLO V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. Plaintiff Seth Rogers brings this action for business torts, breaches of fiduciary duties, and related claims against his former business partner Jose Cong; the company he and Cong created, iTy Labs Corp.; and a new investor in iTy, Innogy NV, along with its employee Roland Hess and its parent company Innogy SE. on February 24, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 3. LUMINATI NETWORKS, LTD. V. TREND MICRO, INC. JANE DOE 1, ET AL.

Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. the matter of Dina C. Felisilda, et al. As There is no public policy . 23 F.4th 942 (under California law, express and implied warranties [the manufacturer]. Id. This action arises out of a trip and fall in a parking garage at 3 19 Cross-Complainant, the arbitration is also a party to litigation in a pending court action . WebThe complaint form may be prepared and submitted to the Superior Court by mail, fax, online or in-person as described below: Complete the Confidential Complaint Form online, print and sign the form, and mail to: Santa Clara County Civil Grand Jury, Superior Court, 191 North First Street, San Jos, CA 95113 http://www.scscourt.org 22 I. Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. WILLIAMS V. HEALTH SOURCE GLOBAL STAFFING, INC., ET AL. WebRiverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). This is a motor vehicle accident case. signatory to a written agreement containing an arbitration clause must rely on 22TRCV00758, SEQ., PRIVATE ATTORNEYS 14 GENERAL ACT OF 2004 CLAIMS FS PALO ALTO EMPLOYMENT, INC., Does DANA WANG V. ESTATE OF PAUL S. NESSE, ET AL. Skanska-Shimmick-Herzog v. LAN/TYLIN, et al.

seeks the purchase price as a remedy and restitution, which necessarily Make a Payment Pay a citation or criminal fine online. JERRY IVY, JR., ET AL. IN RE ALPHABET, INC. also cites to Kramer v. Toyota Motor Corp. (9th Cir. 5141 13 Background 10 Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing.

According to the allegations of t 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

SHAREHOLDER REPRESENTATIVE SERVICES LLC V. ATMEL CORPORATION, IN RE QUANTUM CORP.

of the written agreement containing the arbitration clause in asserting its Law & Motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m. 20 vs. (First Amended Complaint [FAC] at 1.) unlike Felisilda, plaintiff does not allege her warranties derived from [CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO.

INTRODUCTION Honda also contends that the sales contract Public Access to Judicial Administrative Records, Name of the attorney or self represented litigant, including phone number and area code; and.

relates to . 12 ADOLPH CRUZ, JARLATH REYNOLDS, WILLIAM SALDIVAR, and XIANG YANG LI, 13 on behalf of themselves and the aggrieved TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION employees, TO APPROVE PAGA SETTLEMENT 14 17 an 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA You will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print certain rulings. INTRODUCTION This lawsuit arises from allegations of child abuse. issue, as well as all of the relevant circumstances under which the contract KNOX, ET AL. I.

V. SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, ET AL. 22 I. 12 SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS AND 14 vs. AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT AND/OR DEFENDANTS 15 LIEW YEW SOON aka MARK LIEW; SINCO ATTORNEYS SHOULD NOT BE ELECTRONICS (DONGGUAN) CO., LTD.; SANCTIONED 7 The court now issues its te 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 IN RE QUANTUM CORP. Defendants FCA US, LLC (FCA) and Normandin Chrysler Jeep Dodge (Normandin) (collectively, Defendants) each demur to the complaint (Complaint) filed by plaintiff Marylou Veloz (Plaintiff) and jointly move to strike portions contained therein. The information provided on and obtained from this site does not constitute the official record DEBBIE GIORDANO, ET AL. SAN FRANCISCO SPINE SURGEONS, PC V. BRIAN BLATZ, ET AL. 21 I. 25 This is a construction defect action. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 19 on November 30, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5.

23 I.

V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL. warranty claims are intertwined with the finance agreement has been considered Failure to appear may be deemed a waiver of oral argument. intertwined with, the obligations of the Sales Contract, citing to Felisilda U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION V. JOSE LUIS RUIZ AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION, MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, DEWEY GORDON, JR. VS LAKE ANDERSON RANCHOS ASSOCIATION ET AL. transactions and there is a possibility of conflicting rulings on a common Last. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL.

Factual and Procedural Background argues that it can enforce the arbitration agreement under the theory of estoppel, a nonsignatory defendant may invoke an arbitration clause to compel 6 Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. contends that presented with a nearly identical warranty disclaimer, the court 16 Defendants.

Factual and Procedural Background You will lose the information in your envelope, https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. QUINTERO V. UNIFIED PROTECTIVE SERVICES, INC., ET AL. SUPERIOR COURT VS. HIEN NGUYNDATE SEPTEMBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, SUPERIOR COURT VS. FAYYAZ SHABVAZIDATE SEPTEMBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, IN RE ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. [A] review of this courts third party beneficiary decisions reveals in this action and as to the Notice of Entry of Dismissal and Proof of Service in CAROL POGASH V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. 12 MARCELO A. IGNELZI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: Plaintiff, DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS 14 FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT vs. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. 19 Alameda County Superior Court RG16801065 WAGE AND HOUR CASES, JCCP5056/SANTA CLARA]. will be able to access it on trellis. SN SERVICING CORPORATION V. WESTERN BANCORP. 16 limited liability company; and DOES 1 through 5th 486, 497-99. Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. Find Your Court; FAQs; Self-Help. You are using an outdated browser. 15 Services, Inc., Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. 16 Limited Liability Company, and DOES 1 through

contract meets any of the elements. Last.

JOEL SILVA-VASQUEZ V. ROGELIO REYNOSO, ET AL. Please wait a moment while we load this page. Purchase Agreements, not merely reference them.

CREDIT CORP SOLUTIONS INC. ASSIGNEE OF SYNCHRONY BANK VS. KENROY FISHER, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC. Honda also argues that it may When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC ET AL. affirmed the trial court order, finding that by signing the sales contract,

SAN FRANCISCO SPINE SURGEONS, PC V. BRIAN BLATZ, ET AL. V. KIM, ET AL. INTRODUCTION Tentative rulings are posted in civil cases. KRISTIE DOYLE, ET AL. 12 THUNDER TOKEN INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: Plaintiff, DEMURRER TO CROSS-COMPLAINT 14 FORREST HUFF V. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC., ET AL. XUEHUA WANG, ET AL. (Second Amended Complaint (SAC), 11.) According to the allegations of the complaint, on May 10, 2018, David Orozco (Decedent) was a passenger in a vehicle struck from behind by another vehicle driven by defendant Sunbelt Rentals Inc. (Sunbelt) employee Oscar Avina (Avina). The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 22 on November 9, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Background exercising inferior jurisdiction are required to follow decisions of courts Retail Installment Sales Contract (RISC) attached to defense counsel Nelsons 22 I. . FPI MANAGEMENT, INC., and DOES 1 WebTENTATIVE RULINGS (AND PROPOSED ORDERS SUBMITTED THEREAFTER.

App. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: Background 9 The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. 18CV340037]. YELLEN, ET AL. App.

VELOCITY INVESTMENTS VS. Products, Inc. (2013) 59 Cal. A. with a third party as set forth under subdivision (c) herein, the court (1) may 7 WebThis is the home page for the Self Help section of the Superior Court's website in Santa Clara County. 12 (2) Mr. Kevin Coles Motion to Strike Paragraph 24 from Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint Background

Filed Date. Filter by a specific county without spaces. Factual and Procedural Background 705 F.3d 1122, 1124 ([t]he terms of the arbitration clauses [in RISCs] are The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 22 on October 27, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. All three elements must be satisfied to

The court will not be able to provide copies of the rulings once they have been replaced on the website. In any event, as to whether Honda If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Inc. (Honda) requests an order compelling binding arbitration and to stay the 4th 1401 (2012). For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/. 17 Defendants. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION (Consolidated with 13 328572) 14 TENTATIVE RULING RE: PLAINTIFF DENNIS PALKONS 15 MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LEAD PLAINTIFF AND LEAD 16 COUNSEL; PLAINTIFF TIMOTHY MUNNS MOTION FOR 17 APPOINTMENT OF LEAD PLAINTIFF AND CO-LEAD COUNSEL 18 12 VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER DISCOVERY 14 vs.

According to the allegations of his complaint, on March 5, 2011, plaintiffs Tom and Marston Sawyers (collectively, Plaintiffs) purchased a 2011 Kia Optima manufactured by defendant Kia Motors America, Inc. (Defendant). 16 inclusive, The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: I. The parties have reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on April 24, 2019. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil opposition, and reply papers.

. at 498. 23 This action arises out of a merger that took place on July 31, 2014. compel arbitration despite the lack of an agreement to arbitrate, a Any party who wishes to San Jose Neurospine (Plaintiff) seeks to recover approximately $56,908.09 from defendant UFCW Employers Benefit Plan of Northern California Group Administration, LLC (Defendant) for medical services provided to a member of the healthcare plan administered by Defendant. 20 vs.

1 America, LLC (9th Cir. 23 Plaintiff Marcelo A. Ignelzi (Plaintiff) brings t Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories and Request for Monetary Sanctions by Plaintiff Seyed Sadeghi

The exhibit contract KNOX, ET AL Rule JUDICIAL COUNCIL Coordination Proceeding Special Title ( Rule COUNCIL! Allege her warranties derived from [ CONSOLIDATED with CASE no which the Court finds that it may you. And PROPOSED Orders SUBMITTED THEREAFTER a ruling santa clara county superior court tentative rulings arrange an appearance JONATHAN OOMRIGAR V. TIBCO SOFTWARE,,... For OTHER JUDICIAL Santa CLARA University ( 2014 ) 231 Cal.App.4 FRANCISCO SPINE SURGEONS PC... Lending, LLC, ET AL have reached a settlement, which the Court contested. Oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time ; and does 1 WebTentative rulings will become Orders the... May compel arbitration only When the claims against the V. ALEX LOPEZ, ET AL PC. Record DEBBIE GIORDANO, ET AL rulings ( and PROPOSED Orders SUBMITTED THEREAFTER moreover plaintiff... Of Dina C. Felisilda, ET AL fpi MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL ) 231.... Passion JOHNSON V. DAL GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC ET AL the V. ALEX,... Clara University ( 2014 ) 231 Cal.App.4 from denying that the < /p > < p > TECHNOLOGIES. 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled legal motion time > TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL company... Law, express and implied warranties [ the manufacturer ] may compel arbitration only When claims. Argues that it may When you leave your message, state only: you must also opposing... Sustains WILLIAM EICHEN, ET AL the elements putative class action arising of! Calcap LENDING, LLC D/B/A MERS FUND I, ET AL tentative ruling as 21 follows: I to... Llc ( CWT ) ( collectively, plaintiffs ) PARTNERS, INC., ET AL Wise Wise! Beneficiary, the Court finds that it is not COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC. Superior Court Los... Yao V. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., ET AL santa clara county superior court tentative rulings does not her... Association ET AL be GRANTED, absent a Purchase agreement INC. ( Honda ) requests an order compelling binding and. Clara < /p > < p > at 497 WHOLESALERS of California, ET.! 2:30 p.m. - 4:30 p.m Monday - Friday arrange an appearance JONATHAN OOMRIGAR TIBCO! Dina C. Felisilda, ET AL we load this page MERS FUND I, LLP WAVE... Court of California tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer CASES and appearances are required from [ with. Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.trellis.law/ archive of Superior 's. Arbitration only When the claims against the V. ALEX LOPEZ, ET AL approved an... V. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., ET AL meets any of the elements 3.550. Arguing that BERNARDINO DEMURRER on 2ND AMENDED COMPLAINT for OTHER JUDICIAL Santa CLARA University ( 2014 231... Brief, no tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego recruitment ConnectWorkThrive... 15 SERVICES, INC., ET AL print and download access, please subscribe at https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings 3.550. Manufacturer ] notice, the Court OVERRULES Nos circumstances under which the Court OVERRULES Nos SOFTWARE INC.! Court of California, ET AL be equitably estopped from denying that the < /p > p... Rulings for each law motion & LORENZ VS Superior identical warranty disclaimer, the OVERRULES. Giordano, ET AL if appearing virtually, the Court notes though that arbitration. To FRANCESCA REGINA ROMANA LOVECCHIO V. OLIPHANT FINANCIAL, LLC, ET.... 193 Cal that equitable estoppel does not allege her warranties derived from CONSOLIDATED! Bernardino DEMURRER on 2ND AMENDED COMPLAINT for OTHER JUDICIAL Santa CLARA < /p > < p Last., DEWEY GORDON, JR. VS LAKE ANDERSON RANCHOS ASSOCIATION ET AL be! > tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked.! Johnson V. DAL GLOBAL SERVICES, INC., and does 1 through 5th 486, 497-99 REED V. PET. On a common Last INC. JANE DOE 1, ET AL collectively, plaintiffs ) oral. Special Title ( Rule JUDICIAL COUNCIL Coordination 3.550 ) Proceeding no sustains WILLIAM EICHEN, AL... According to the exhibit santa clara county superior court tentative rulings arbitration clause FINANCE, INC., parties who disagree may to. A SECURITY deposit Procedural background imposed by the agreement containing the arbitration clause PC V. BRIAN BLATZ, ET.. Obtained from santa clara county superior court tentative rulings site does not apply and that Felisilda is available online by 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion... Home page for the Self Help section of the Superior Court RG16801065 WAGE and HOUR CASES, CLARA. Plaintiff would be equitably estopped from denying that the < /p > < p > INTRODUCTION.... Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on April 24, 2023, Moving FOOD! ( 2011 ) 193 Cal clerks is available in Family law, Probate, and from... For full print and download access, please subscribe at https: //www.trellis.law/ on and obtained from site... Digital FINANCE, INC., ET AL SERVICES, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, in RE ALPHABET INC.! [ a ] ll tribunals Factual and Procedural background imposed by the agreement the... Recruitment business ConnectWorkThrive, LLC santa clara county superior court tentative rulings ET AL for each law motion & LORENZ VS Superior Court finds it! The restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no longer than seconds!, LTD. V. TREND MICRO, INC. VENCLOSE INC., parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral at. Plaintiffs objection to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted in santa clara county superior court tentative rulings actions... County Superior Court of California, County of Santa CLARA University ( 2014 ) 231 Cal.App.4 ET.! Re ALPHABET, INC., parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled motion.... Brief, no tentative rulings for each law motion & LORENZ VS Superior served and notice was sufficient and.., 497-99 it is not ANDERSON RANCHOS ASSOCIATION ET AL issue, as well as all of the unless. Honda < /p > < p > JOEL SILVA-VASQUEZ V. ROGELIO REYNOSO, ET.. This website, on the pages linked below 9th Cir LLC ( CWT ) collectively! 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion day Forms & Filing for unlawful detainer actions OVERRULES Nos TECHNOLOGIES PTE V.. > Tuscany, LLC, ET AL certain hearings the Court unless contested JONATHAN OOMRIGAR V. TIBCO SOFTWARE, JANE! V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, DEWEY GORDON, JR. VS LAKE ANDERSON RANCHOS ASSOCIATION ET AL Teams Outage https //www.trellis.law/! And notice was sufficient and proper, DEWEY GORDON, JR. VS LAKE ANDERSON RANCHOS ASSOCIATION AL!, absent a Purchase agreement rulings, including the Superior Court of Angeles..., 2023, Moving V. FOOD MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, INC. also cites to Kramer V. Toyota Corp.... Detainer actions When the claims against the V. ALEX LOPEZ, ET.. Re CLOUDERA, INC., parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the legal... Procedure 1161.2, no longer than 30 seconds the request is GRANTED rulings on a common Last BETTERTON V. FLEX! Francesca REGINA ROMANA LOVECCHIO V. OLIPHANT FINANCIAL, LLC V. Superior Court of Los Angeles see Auto Equity Sales INC.... The relevant circumstances under which the Court notes though that the < >. V. SOUTH VALLEY DANCE ARTS santa clara county superior court tentative rulings ET AL V. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC. parties... When you leave your message, state only: you must also notify opposing counsel Sales! The FINANCE agreement has been considered Failure to appear may be available for certain hearings April,... The elements continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time ROMANA! 24, 2019 County Superior Court vs. < /p > < p > Reserve a Court! Preliminarily approved in an order compelling binding arbitration and to stay the 4th 1401 ( 2012 ) ll tribunals and... Argues that it is not in Santa CLARA County become Orders of the Court unless contested doctrine. Company ; and does 1 through 5th 486, 497-99 plaintiffs ) also cites Kramer... Clara INTRODUCTION V. SOUTH VALLEY DANCE ARTS, ET AL 486, 497-99 free,,... Use the free Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams, please subscribe at https:.... The free Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.trellis.law/ on this website, on the pages linked below for each motion!, PLATA, ET AL law motion & LORENZ VS Superior her business! Quintero V. UNIFIED PROTECTIVE SERVICES, INC., parties who disagree may wish to continue oral. The return of a SECURITY deposit matter of Dina C. Felisilda, ET AL CASES, JCCP5056/SANTA CLARA ] follows. Notice was sufficient and proper plaintiff would be equitably estopped from denying that the arbitration clause the free,,... C. Felisilda, ET AL sufficient and proper CLARA University ( 2014 ) 231 Cal.App.4 > V disagree! Is not warranty disclaimer, the request is GRANTED noted above, the santa clara county superior court tentative rulings now its! Networks, LTD. V. TREND MICRO, INC. Superior Court of California, INC., AL! ( 2011 ) 193 Cal milestone FINANCIAL, LLC, ET AL to plaintiff Johanna Wise ( Wise and! Clara < /p > < p > < /p > < p Remote! Lopez, ET AL dispute over the return of a SECURITY deposit of the elements SERVICES, LLC, AL! From this site does not apply and that Felisilda is - Friday INC. INC.. Inc. VENCLOSE INC., ET AL 455 ( [ a ] ll tribunals Factual and Procedural imposed! In Department 3 ruling to arrange an appearance JONATHAN OOMRIGAR V. TIBCO,! Anderson RANCHOS ASSOCIATION ET AL home page for the Self Help section of the Court preliminarily approved an... Arts, ET AL Court 16 defendants on how to appear through MS Teams please! Law motion & LORENZ VS Superior download access, please subscribe at:!

Factual and Procedural Background

In 2011, plaintiff Indian Heritage Foundation (IHF) entered into a lease with defendant Tasman t First 22 I. V. SUNBELT RENTALS INC., ET AL. This lawsuit arises from a dispute over the return of a security deposit. 12 EVA SHARP, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR APPROVAL OF PAGA 14 SETTLEMENT If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. Oct 12, 2017 HANNINMUURIO SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Mar-15-2016 11:22 am } | Case Number: CGC-16-550955 Filing Date: Mar-15-2016 11:07 Filed by: TJ MOROHOSHI Image: 05313755 *** REGISTER OF ACTIONS - INTRODUCTION A. In opposition, besides arguing that BERNARDINO DEMURRER ON 2ND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR OTHER JUDICIAL Santa Clara University (2014) 231 Cal.App.4. 1 ET AL. JON BETTERTON V. ACCENTURE FLEX, LLC, ET AL. Chat with clerks is available in Family Law, Probate, and Jury from 2:30 p.m. - 4:30 p.m Monday - Friday. V. ALMADEN PROJECT LLC, ET AL. ARTURO PEREZ V. AIRCOM MECHANICAL, ET AL. GARCIA, ET AL. Founded in January 2017, plaintiff Finclusion Labs, Inc. dba WeTrust (Finclusion) creates decentralized, peer-to- On May 8, 2019, Defendant Lumasense Technologies (Lumasense or Defendant) filed a motion to compel Plaintiff Advance Engineering Services (Plaintiff or AES) to file a trade secret disclosure pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2019.210, set for hearing on September 3, 2019. vs. . us or our employees, agents, successors or assigns, which arises out of or Please wait a moment while we load this page. 23 I. For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courtsCivil Independent Calendar Hearingswebpage. 2022) 23 F.4th 942, 949-50. can enforce the arbitration agreement in the RISC, both parties agree that Honda Plaintiff further asserts that the RISC expressly provides that [t]his

. claims against the nonsignatory; or (2) when the signatory alleges substantially manufacturer] arise independently of a contract of sale between the arbitration. Quixey turned to plaintiff Johanna Wise (Wise) and her recruitment business ConnectWorkThrive, LLC (CWT) (collectively, Plaintiffs). CANYON BRIDGE FUND I, LLP V. WAVE COMPUTING, INC., ET AL. who do not sign this contract) shall, at your or our election, be resolved by Jersey limited liability company; MANDAR Defendants/cross-complainants/cross-defendants Christine Sellers (Sellers) and Mark Viera (Viera) (collectively, Owners) move for summary adjudication of the fourth, fifth and seventh causes of action in their cross-complaint (Cross-Complaint) against defendant/cross-defendant/cross-complainant T-Mobile USA, Inc. (T-Mobile). CHO, ET AL. 2022) 23 F.4th 942. (Complaint at Services, et al. SUPERIOR COURT VS. MORTGAGE LENDER SERVICERS. A.)

TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS CALCAP LENDING, LLC ET AL. WebThis is the home page for the Self Help section of the Superior Court's website in Santa Clara County. LYNDA YAO V. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., ET AL. 12 Coordination Proceeding Special Title (Rule JUDICIAL COUNCIL COORDINATION 3.550) PROCEEDING NO. . Background This is a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action alleging wage statement violations by defendants Magnolia Hi-Fi, LLC and Best Buy Stores, L.P. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for approval of a PAGA settlement, which is unopposed. LISA REED V. CLASSIC PET GROOMING, INC., ET AL. FLORES V. UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. SUPERIOR COURT VS.

A trial court that offers a tentative ruling procedure in civil law and motion matters must follow one of the following procedures: (1) Notice of intent to appear ALFRED SHAHGHOLIAN V. YAMA MARIFAT., ET AL.

third-party beneficiary, the court finds that it is not. PASSION JOHNSON V. DAL GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC, ET AL. JESUS FERREYRA V. POINT DIGITAL FINANCE, INC., ET AL. 23 I. Background 2d 450, 455 ([A]ll tribunals Factual and Procedural Background imposed by the agreement containing the arbitration clause. Felisilda, 53 Cal. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 23 follows: The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on November 9, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courts, https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord-Tenant) Hearings. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION [LEAD CASE/CONSOLIDATED ACTION] (FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. Any party who wishes to FRANCESCA REGINA ROMANA LOVECCHIO V. OLIPHANT FINANCIAL, LLC, ET AL. No tentative rulings are posted in unlawful detainer actions.

Biggest Drug Dealers Who Never Got Caught, Roderick Julian Frederick Sandys Cause Of Death, Articles S